part 1: answering sheehan


E-mail this post

All personal information that you provide here will be governed by the Privacy Policy of More...

sheehan has set up her circus in crawford texas demanding the president answer two questions. i would like to answer those questions on behalf of the president.

1. We want our loved ones sacrifices to be honored by bringing our nation's sons and daughters home from the travesty that is Iraq immediately, since this war is based on horrendous lies and deceptions. Just because our children are dead, why would we want any more families to suffer the same pain and devastation that we are?

we should bring home the troops. it makes no sense to keep them there. especially since it has become the main training grounds for terrorists. why would we want our military in the new training grounds for terrorism? they could get hurt. they might want to re-enlist and go back. as seen in kansas it is not wise to let other people make decisions. people thinking for themselves is dangerous and could very well result in them putting themselves in situations where they might get hurt or even killed.

the iraq war was based on lies and deceptions.

quiz time again. all right answers will grant you the right to drill for oil in alaska. who said the following?

a. "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
c. " In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
d. "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it."

answers: a. sandy "stuff 'em and steal 'em" berger, b. al "lock box" gore, c. hillary "can't wait til 2008" clinton, d. john "christmas in cambodia" kerry

and to think gore was vice president, gore and kerry were presidential candidates, and clinton is a senator and soon to be presidential candidate. no mention of sandy "fancy pants" berger. he was unavailable for a comment due to plans to put the constitution in his pants. we can't have liars like these serving in office. i wont let someone else's children die because these people tell lies about wmd's. its just not fair.

but to answer the real question, the actual question: why would we want others to suffer the same pain of losing a loved one in war? the answer is quite simple. until assholes stop flying planes into buildings, until assholes stop driving cars full of explosives, until assholes stop blowing up trains and tube stations and themselves and naval vessels and embassies and night clubs and resorts and hijacking planes...until these assholes stop their "religion" of love and peace someone is going to have to die, either us or them and i am thankful we have people brave enough to do it...because im not. trying to understand a rabid dog will not prevent it from biting you. suffering is imminent. suffering was and is on the horizon no matter what we chose to do. we made the decision to suffer less now than to suffer more later.

Previous posts



ATOM 0.3
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by